Many avenues to explore


Fire and Hemlock
by Diana Wynne Jones.
Mammoth 1990 (1985)

Fire and Hemlock is one of Diana Wynne Jones’ more haunting books, with characters, situations and references that linger long after a first reading. It’s well known that the plot outline is taken from Northern ballads recounting the stories of Young Tam Lin and Thomas the Rhymer, especially as she heads each chapter with quotes from the ballads and refers explicitly to the tales in her text.

The tales of a young man lured to the Otherworld by a fairy, and in the case of Tam Lin then rescued by a young woman, are purloined and brought into the 20th century, along with a heady mix of The Golden Bough and a whole host of other plots and characters.

Thomas Lynn is the young man, Laurel his fairy queen and young Polly (whom we follow from just before she starts secondary education to when she is in her first year at Oxford) is Tom’s apparent saviour. We also get to meet Polly’s dysfunctional family, her grandmother and her school friends, along with Tom’s associates, both human and otherworldly.

The novel succeeds on a human level, largely because it seems to have a autobiographical flavour to it: Polly, like Jones, is drawn to books even though her parents largely disapprove, and like Jones, is able to create other realities through the power of story. Jones’ book references, quite apart from their relevance to the plot (as when Tom insists that Polly reads the book on fairy tales he has sent her), must be a good indicator of Diana’s own childhood and adult reading matter. Joan Aiken’s The Wolves of Willoughby Chase is one of the first mentioned (published in 1962, not too long before Jones embarked on her own writing career and which may have been an inspiration); then there’s some E Nesbit stories such as The Treasure Seekers, The Three Musketeers of course, and tales of King Arthur (a running theme in many of Diana’s books, most obviously in The Merlin Conspiracy and Hexwood). Another long-recognised influence on Fire and Hemlock is T S Eliot’s Four Quartets, principally the images and structure, though many of Jones’ potential young adult readership would remain less aware of this (as I was, until it was pointed out to me).

There are so many avenues to explore in this tantalising novel, but I will begin by thinking about the significance of names. I’ll start with the fairy who seduces the Tom Lin character, Laurel (or, to give her the names she has in the Will reading which takes place early in the novel, Eudora Mabel Lorelei Perry Lynn Leroy). Eudora (“good, excellent gift”) was one of the Greek sea nymphs, but perhaps the name is used rather ironically here, as is Mabel (from French aimable, “loveable”). Lorelei of course is the siren of the Rhine, a literary creation apparently, a river nymph who ensnared passing males. Perry, probably originally of Welsh origin (ap Hari, son of Harry), here is probably a reference to peri, an exotic alternative name for a fairy. Lynn of course was her married name, while Leroy is the surname of her new husband, Morton; Leroy is from French le roi, the king, referring to Seb’s father as an Oberon type of Fairy King. (The other father-figure in Polly’s life is her own weak-willed dad Reg, whose name also harks back to Latin rex, regis “king”. It’s all rather Golden Bough, isn’t it? Jones of course dwells on this at length later the the book.)

Lorelei naturally got anglicised as Laurel. The bay laurel is used in cooking, but it is advisable not to eat the whole leaves as they can damage internal organs, so I suppose this is appropriate for Polly’s adversary. Another bane of Polly’s life is her mother Ivy, poison perhaps by name and certainly poison by nature, though as this is Britain the parasitic ivy alluded to is the smothering kind. Another little etymological puzzle, the enigmatic Mary Fields: what’s her role? She is of course a natural rival for Tom’s affections with Polly Whittacker (= “white acre”).

The novel has three real-life locations, London, Oxford and Bristol, all three of which are places where DWJ lived and which reflect on the part-autobiographical nature of Fire and Hemlock. Somewhere in the middle of this triangle must be Middleton (hence its name, perhaps). Nearby Stow-on-the-Water is a mash-up of two real places in the Cotswolds, Bourton-on-the-Water (a largish village, characterised by lots of pedestrian bridges over the river and presumably liable to flooding) and Stow-on-the-Wold (which exactly matches up with the description of the fictional Stow except the market cross is more recent than the Saxon period). In Jones’ fictional England topography and atmosphere are similar to but not the same as the real England of the mid-80s, and are her attempt to transfer the world of the Scottish Border ballads to the southern Britain that she knew well.

Oxford gets a relatively short space in the novel; while Jones went to St Anne’s College, Polly in the novel goes to St Margaret’s. St Margaret’s is the novel’s version of the real-life Lady Margaret Hall (another college founded for women students), and this college’s coat-of-arms is instructive. First of all it features a portcullis (the gate features in the incident in a Ghost Castle at the fair), and secondly the motto is Souvent me souviens (“I often remember”), highly appropriate for one of the overarching themes of the novel. Possibly coincidentally there is an early years school in Headington, Oxford called Hunsdon House, which may have inspired Laurel’s supernatural mansion: did Diana’s children attend this school when she lived there?

Like many others I’ve had to reread the ending quite a few times and, yes, it is very obscure what has actually happened, and how. Polly realises that the only way she can save Tom from dying is to lose him, but somehow she and Tom are together in the final chapter. I can only surmise that we have to add together the two insights that Polly gives us: (1) Tom has been using her to try to save himself from his fate; and (2) Polly says she doesn’t want to see him again. In a way nearly everybody is using somebody else (even Polly’s Granny, who has been trying to find out what happened to her own loved one in the past), and also in a way, we all use others, strangers as well as friends; the point being that we put others first before ourselves if we truly love them. When Polly declares she doesn’t want to see Tom again, presumably she means the selfish Tom who tried to save himself, whom we contrast with Polly who is prepared to give up her happiness to save Tom.

Jones’ lovely wordplays on Now and Here and Nowhere, which we first meet on stone vases in the grounds of Hunsdon House, are clearly a facet of Jones’ favourite themes of parallel worlds and existences, related in this case to the different paths referenced in the ballads. This may be easier to fathom than the book’s title. Commentaries have pointed out the significances of these two story elements: fire standing for life, in particular creative energy, hemlock standing for death, the two representing the quick (the living) and the dead. In the finale hemlock plants are described as growing next to the pool, the portal to death. Jones spent some of her childhood years in Wales, so she would have been familiar with the Welsh word tân, which means “fire”. Hence the hero names of the members of the quartet (which of themselves seem otherwise quite arbitrary). So some of the underlying symbolism (the flooding in Stow, the depressing rainy British weather, the ripples of the Hunsdon House pool) can be seen as reflecting the antithesis of the literary and creative sparks that Polly and her friends exhibit. Perhaps the Tam Lin of the ballads reminded Jones of Welsh tân ‘fire’ and Welsh llyn ‘lake’ and from these she took her cues.

The use of musical terms in the novel might help in interpreting the ending. Fire and Hemlock really is about the power of words to change reality, and Jones, like many another fantasy-writer, also uses words to subvert what passes for reality. So, though Eliot’s Four Quartets poems are implicitly referred to, and Tom is part of a string quartet in Fire and Hemlock, the addition of a fifth player, Polly, is what changes the dynamics of everything. That is reflected in the divisions of the book: four parts (like the movements of a string quartet composition) but with the addition of a tail-piece, the Coda, an envoi to the work. This coda is Polly herself, and it marks the real division in her life, from being the tomboy (I use the word deliberately) that Tom has used for his own purposes to the young woman who has shouldered the responsibilities of being an adult.

The choice of words for tempi in the different parts is very deliberate. Allegro vivace: both words mean ‘lively’, with allegro also implying brisk/quick; this is Fire as Life. Andante cantabile: at a walking pace (not slow, really) but also sung (there’s a lot in this section about the books Tom sends Polly, including The Oxford Book of Ballads). Allegro con fuoco: ‘with fire’; how more explicit can Jones be? The third movement, traditionally a rather sedate minuet, morphed into a faster more playful scherzo by the 19th century, but here it has morphed even more. Presto molto agitato: final movements were invariably very fast, and so this part of the book urgently rushes like a headstrong horse to its climactic scene at Hunsdon House.

A coda is something tagged on, and in music it is usually the final section of a movement. In this novel it stands outside the formal scheme, a fifth not-movement. Marked scherzando, its musical meaning (‘playful’) refers also to Jones’ intention for this section: it is a play on words, a pun, a joke (this is what scherzo literally translates as in Italian). She is trying to say that at the last Polly’s words are a verbal sleight-of-hand, a word-magician’s way of misdirecting Laurel as to her real intentions. And like any good magician Jones doesn’t quite reveal how she has done the trick.

Repost of review first published 4th October 2012; Bristol’s Colston Hall (where the quartet perform towards the end of the novel) is now, after the toppling of the statue of philanthropist and slave trader Edward Colston in 2020 by #BLM protestors, renamed Bristol Beacon.

Diana Wynne Jones

32 thoughts on “Many avenues to explore

  1. Enjoying your back pages! This is a really useful contribution – speaking as one who has re-read this book many times and is still bemused. But a haunting work in the best sense, and a wonderful writer.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes certainly, Lizza, and an author I’m still exploring and enjoying. Thanks for your kind words, even though I feel I’ve only just scratched the surface of this beguiling novel.


  2. Pingback: Witch Week Summary, Giveaway Winner, and 2015 Preview - The Emerald City Book Review

  3. I never understood the ending of this one until I lived through it in my own life. And then I was so grateful to have had this book in my heart as a guide to that unsettling transformation, the losing of everything in order to become free, and what’s on the other side of that. Your explanation is quite good I think. We simply cannot hang on to and possess other people, or let them possess us, or we all become like Laurel and therefore remain under her power. The only way out is to let go, and then the only way to still stay alive is through the imagination, the fire of true life.

    I didn’t know that Tan meant fire, so thank you for that. Makes total sense along with all the other fire/water imagery.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. You’ve put that letting-go-to-be-free approach much more succinctly than I did, Lory—obsession and control and possessiveness constrain us so much more than we realise but seem to be on the increase in society, or perhaps some of us have become more aware of that malaise.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I think we (or some of us anyway) are becoming more aware of the trap. Initially that can make it seem like its power is growing, because when we were blind to it we could pretend it didn’t exist. But actually it was always there, and it’s a good sign and when we’re not caught in unconsciousness any more, an opportunity for new growth. Only we have to find the strength to make the final break. Polly is definitely one of my heroes on that count. And by extension Diana Wynne Jones as well. In book after book she described this stepping into freedom, if never quite so starkly.

        Liked by 2 people

        1. It’s really interesting. I’m just completing a LOTR post which discusses, inter alia, the notion of sacrifice in Tolkien’s narrative, famously when Frodo is faced with the choice of surrendering the Ring at the Crack of Doom or not. As it is the decision is taken out of his hands—literally—by Gollum, equally motivated by possessiveness, and the Ring of Power is indeed sacrificed. (The prime example in LOTR of an evil intention augmented by an evil act ultimately equalling something good.) The notion of letting something of worth go so that a greater benefit may result is prefigured in The Hobbit when Bilbo surrenders the Arkenstone to what Thorin sees as his enemies.

          And Polly has always been one of my heroes too, along with Sophie, but you’re right when you say her qualities are echoed time and again in other DWJ narratives.

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Where would we be without fantasy and children’s books? In the dark, I tell you. They have so much to teach us, that people who dismiss them as “kids’ stuff” will never know.

            Liked by 1 person

  4. Enjoyed this post- especially your exploration of names (I didn’t know for instance the connection between Lorelai and Laurel–I always associated the latter with the plant). Also Perry and Peri (never thought of that one either).

    I also enjoyed the exploration of the title (hemlock stood out of course, since I just read a mystery where they poisoned people with water hemlock).

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yay, I’m glad, Mallika! I wasn’t sure if this very wordy old review would still work several years on but it’s good you’ve picked up my point about how Jones is alive to the power and import of words and names.

      Incidentally, there’s been a warning locally about certain umbelliferous plants, flowers of the carrot family to which hemlocks belong, growing profusely along river and canal banks this year and which carry health risks if touched by innocent hands. I’ve steered well clear of them since then!

      Liked by 1 person

  5. alisondoig

    Thank you for republishing this. Really illuminating, particularly the music stuff which I hadn’t really picked up on. Interestingly, Hunsdon House is an old English folk tune, sometimes used by Morris dancers. ( Apologies if you have already mentioned this elsewhere). I think this is my favourite DWJ, admittedly a very difficult choice. It’s so complex and the characters are so good. Even after many readings I’m not sure I really understand the ending.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. You’d think that, being a Morris dancer in some bygone age, I would’ve made the link between tune and fictional building, but no—this will have been during my student years when precious little impinged on my consciousness…

      But thanks for the suggestion, Alison, I shall ponder that now! I’m nearing the end of my DWJ rereads, and so a third read of all my copies will soon beckon when I will see if I’m any closer to an understanding! I’m glad you got something out of my review, a somewhat rambling discourse on what struck me at the time I first posted this.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks so much, Karen! I think it took me three reads to start to make a bit of sense of F&H. The first time was mystifying but I just knew it was a powerful piece; the second time I got bound up with the characters and how the atmosphere was achieved; by the third time I was beginning to see how multi-layered it was and, with the help of Reflections, how deeply personal it was. Who knows what we’ll all get out of it on a fourth read? 🙂

      Liked by 2 people

      1. I’m not necessarily looking for her lighter work; I’ll probably read Time of the Ghost before I return to Fire & Hemlock, along with some of the lighter books. I haven’t read very many of her books yet, and I think I’ll probably get more out of F & H if I read some of the others.


        1. You’re right, Time of the Ghost is definitely not one of her lighter works! I’m aiming to reread Archer’s Goon to review next, one of the last of her standalone novels I currently own, which was quite confusing the first time I read it.


  6. That is a lovely thought provoking post. I’ve only read the one DWJ book – Howl’s Moving Castle which I enjoyed very much. I should read some more of her work, I think I had the second book already.
    Lynn 😀

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Apologies for missing this comment and not replying sooner, Lynn, but thanks for it. If you enjoyed the Howl story you should enjoy this too; and if you were a nerdy bookish child (as many of us seem to have been) you’d definitely appreciate this. (Also in a similar vein but perhaps a little darker is Jo Walton’s Among Others, which I recommend if you haven’t already come across it.)

      Liked by 1 person

        1. The Walton book is set in the Welsh valleys and Welsh Borders, so the background felt very familiar. It did feel slow in places — an impediment to enjoyment, I admit — but I admired it enormously.

          Liked by 1 person

    1. I know it worries many, as does the 16 year gap between Emma Woodhouse and George Knightley. I wonder if DWJ was unconsciously amalgamating the Austen plot with her own experience of being courted as a student by the academic John Burrow two years her senior: it’s always dicey using incidents in your own life as plot devices (as she did time and again in her fiction).

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Two years is nothing, but the power imbalance would have made it very dodgy indeed. DWJ’s attitude to various subjects (as reflected in her fiction) is a little questionable. I’m not even sure that she was conscious of showing herself. Some bits in a recent reread of Deep Secret made me feel quite uncomfortable.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. True enough. Without excusing her in any way I think the combination of when she was born and her dysfunctional upbringing has resulted in some weird, dodgy even, expressions and assumptions in her writing.

          Liked by 1 person

Do leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.