No scruples

Inverted Commas 18: Hands tied

“Evil can be unscrupulous, and good can’t. Evil has nothing to stop it doing what it wants, while good has one hand tied behind its back. To do the things it needs to do to win, it’d have to become evil to do ’em.” — Farder Coram, Chapter 15 ‘Letters’

Parts of Philip Pullman’s The Secret Commonwealth (2018) have both a universal relevance and one equally specific regarding the times we live in now. A chapter in which Lyra as the main protagonist is trying to escape detection in the Norfolk Broads is just such an instance. She is discussing with the gyptian elder Coram how it is that the Consistorial Court of Discipline is able to achieve what it does, and Coram gives her his view of the current political situation in Lyra’s world.

“It all changed then to what we got now — a government what dun’t trust the people, and a people that’s afraid of the government, each side spying on the other.”

It’s of course in the nature of politics that you have one ruling party and at least one other in opposition. In a nominal democracy there is however a trust that both sides uphold the laws framed to ensure good government, and that there is a fair degree of consensus as to what counts as fair treatment for society.

But when that consensus dissipates, and the rulers are seen to not abide by the rule of law, or that the laws promulgated are not fair to all citizens, then suspicion and lying and underhand dealings (and worse) become commonplace.

How does a government or similar authority — mercenary, unprincipled, privileged, self-serving or misguided, or all of these — achieve what it does?

“The other side’s got an energy that our side en’t got. Comes from their certainty about being right. If you got that certainty you’ll be willing to do anything to bring about the end you want. It’s the oldest human problem, Lyra, an’ it’s the difference between good and evil.”

This is the eternal dichotomy: does copying your opponent’s reprehensible tactics make you no better than them, even if the end result is to the greater good? Does merely claiming the moral high ground ultimately achieve what’s equitable or is it a mug’s game? This ethical issue runs through much of high fantasy, Pullman’s included, but it’s as pertinent to our own times as it is for all time.


A review of The Secret Commonwealth will appear here in due course

4 thoughts on “No scruples

    1. Here in the UK we have a government which is seriously contemplating breaking international law, whether as a form of brinkmanship or (as I suspect) another step on the way to sow confusion on their way to ruling by diktat and enriching themselves and their friends. I can’t see them doing what they ‘need’ to do and then stepping down, any more than I can see the rogue leaders of other states (for example Belarus, Hungary, Turkey, Russia, Brazil, and of course the US) voluntarily relinquishing power by disqualifying themselves, can you?

      If however you mean the forces of opposition should do ‘what’s needed’ to counter fascist power grabs, I think that whole notion is fraught with massive danger — witness the French Revolution and the Reign of Terror, or the October Revolution leading to Stalinist measures. Once you descend to the base level of such illegimate forces you inevitably open the floodgates to destruction.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Destruction IS among us already.

        The only question is whether the situation is salvageable.

        Term limits – and no monarchies, at least none with power – is one way. 45 is already talking about a THIRD term (which our laws don’t allow) when he hasn’t even won a SECOND one.

        I just meant that, like Heinlein proposed in several of his novels, the savior should then take himself out of the loop, because he KNOWS he has gone too far.

        Not that those who would be considered such know how to leave!

        The masses do sometimes rise up and get rid of some of the tyrants, but, as you’ve noted, those transitions take a lot of other people with them. I don’t know how this one will resolve, this political mess + pandemic. And I’m helpless to do anything about the onslaught.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. None of these autocrats, would-be or otherwise, ever has any intention of stepping down, even if they had a mind to. Mugabe in Zimbabwe, for example, or Lukashenko in Belarus, these individuals have to hang on to power because they leave themselves open to prosecution or worse if they voluntarily relinquish power.

          This is why Trump is desperate to get another term or, unconstitutionally, a third: he’s 74 now (frighteningly, only two years older than me) and at 82 might be able to claim dementia if he got what he wanted.

          Like

Do leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.