Jane’s relations

George Richmond’s initial portrait sketch of Charlotte Brontë

As promised, I’m continuing my appreciation of Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre with further discussions, based on aspects of the novel I’ve not noted mentioned elsewhere or viewed quite as aslant. This post aims to examine Jane Eyre’s relations.

I use the term ‘relations’ in a couple of principal senses here: first, in terms of humans (Jane’s relatives, and her relationships with suitors) and, secondly, concerning how Jane appears to structure her narrative, that is, how in terms of patterns she relates her ‘autobiography’.

I’m certain I’m not the first to observe Charlotte’s creation as very like herself in terms of physicality, temperament, interests and even occupation: Jane, like Charlotte, is small and very much ‘a plain Jane’, holds strong opinions, reads similar books and is a sometime governess. What is strikingly different is that Jane is an orphan and an only child, whereas not only did Charlotte’s father outlive her but she herself had three surviving siblings when Jane Eyre was published.

Restored ‘Pillar Portrait’ of the Brontë siblings with ghost image of Branwell

But the author does set up extended family relationships in this fiction to mirror her own, except that she substitutes cousins, the Reeds and the Rivers. (You might have noticed watery connections with these names, perhaps triggered by Eyre, a genuine local surname which Charlotte had spotted but which sounds suspiciously like Aire, the Yorkshire river with which the author was more than familiar.)

Comparison table of Brontës, Reeds and Rivers

The poet in Charlotte seems to have echoed correspondences in her own family. Her brother Branwell, whose behaviour had become more and more erratic, is matched by ne’er-do-well John Reed and contrasts with the cold fish who is St John Eyre Rivers. Charlotte’s sister Emily may have lent her initial to Eliza Reed and her final letter to Mary Rivers, while Anne Brontë’s name is suspiciously embedded in both Georgiana Reed and Diana Rivers.

There is more: the fate of each individual cousin is broadly comparable. St John Eyre Rivers leaves for missionary work abroad, where he will die in due course, while John Reed departs for the bourne from which no traveller returns. Diana and Mary Rivers, both with a five thousand pound share of a legacy, marry well and happily; meanwhile haughty Georgiana Reed marries into society, while her sister Eliza chooses to be a Bride of Christ (she later becomes a Mother Superior).

Jane Eyre’s extended family relationships

Yet while the Brontës, like many siblings, may not always be of one mind, it’s fairly clear that the Reeds and the Rivers are on opposite sides of the moral fence. In fact the two sets of cousins bookend the novel, the Reeds selfish, disdainful, bullying, the Rivers charitable and welcoming.

Am I imagining all this, the apparent correspondences and the relationships? I think not: for while it was conventional to refer to in-laws as ‘brother’ or ‘sister’ Jane writes of her wishes for a sibling relationship with her Rivers cousins. (In Shirley, completed after the tragic deaths of all Charlotte’s siblings, the two female leads Caroline and Shirley declare that they have a sisterly relationship.) Of course, Charlotte isn’t explicitly or even implicitly equating her sisters and brother with her fictional characters, but it’s likely there was some overlap in terms of the Jane-Charlotte figure being part of a quartet of three women and a man.

There is a less defined relationship between Jane and Rochester’s acquaintances the Ingrams, making yet another quartet: in this the vapid Lord Theodore Ingram and his snooty sisters Mary and, especially, Blanche disregard the mousey Jane, for she is merely the governess of Rochester’s ward Adèle.

Constantin Héger: a model for Edward Rochester?

I now come to Jane’s relationships with men, particularly the ones that propose to her. I begin with Rochester, a distant but polite man, not conventionally handsome yet striking, a man who pretends to be attracted to another (Blanche Ingram), who is in fact married to Bertha Mason while all the time attracted to plain Jane.

Let me introduce you — should you not already be acquainted with him — to Constantin Héger, the married professor at the school in Brussels where Charlotte first studied and latter taught at. Here too is a distant yet polite man, maintaining a scrupulous relationship with his pupil and later employee; utterly infatuated with Constantin, Charlotte believes he only pretends to love his wife, Claire Zoë, while secretly wishing to be with the young Englishwoman. When CB returned to Yorkshire he ceased to correspond with her, allowing her to believe that Mme Héger was, like Bertha Mason, a millstone around Constantin’s neck.

Constantin Héger and family

All of this scenario is on record, in Charlotte’s letters and other documentary evidence. But then not only did Charlotte fictionalise this pretended ménage à trois in Jane Eyre, but aspects appeared later in Shirley (between Caroline, the Anglo-Belgian Robert Moore and his sister Hortense) and particularly in Villette (between Lucy Snowe, professor Paul Emanuel and headteacher Mme Beck).

Extraordinary that CB should persist with a theme of obsessive love throughout her adult fiction, prefigured even in The Professor, unpublished in her lifetime. There famously exists a family portrait of the Hégers: it’s noteworthy that Constantin stands somewhat apart from his six children, while Zoë Héger forms the absolute focal point of the painting.

The other two males who take a close interest in Jane will be the subject to round off this essay. First to come are the evangelical figures of Mr Brocklehurst, who stalks the early chapters, and St John Rivers, who in fact features in the final paragraphs of the novel (not, as one might expect, Edward Rochester). Both are stern, hard and unyielding figures — each notably compared to black pillars — and surmised to be based on individuals CB was familiar with (at least one of whomlike proposed to her, as Rivers does to Jane). Both wanted to ‘master’ her, Brocklehurst to rid her of the falsehoods that supposedly were her stock in trade and later to force her to remain and teach at Lowood, Rivers to persuade her not only to marry him but to work and die as a missionary, doing the Lord’s work as interpreted by a humourless husband.

But Jane won’t submit to such a joyless, loveless life, she literally shudders to think of being St John’s “helpmeet” whom he can “influence efficiently in life, and retain absolutely till death.” She cannot imagine a middle way between “absolute submission and determined revolt,” she writes, between being

“always restrained, and always checked — forced to keep the fire of my nature continually low, to compel it to burn inwardly and never utter a cry, though the imprisoned flame consumed vital after vital”

and the opposite extreme, when she would reach “the moment of bursting, sometimes with a volcanic vehemence” (Volume III chapter 8).

That insistence on a fiery image is of course a kind of unconscious premonition of the fire that will subsequently consume Thornfield, as much as it is a contrast to her assessment of St John as “good and great, but severe; and, for me, cold as an iceberg”. Such contrasts and comparisons in characters and relationships are for me a distinguishing feature of CB’s masterful technique.


Select bibliography

Charlotte Brontë: Jane Eyre. Penguin Classics 1996

Juliet Gardiner: The World Within. The Brontës at Haworth: A Life in Letters, Diaries and Writings. Collins & Brown 1992

Paul Thompson: The Reader’s Guide to Charlotte Brontë’s “Jane Eyre”. Accessed 28/11/2019

12 thoughts on “Jane’s relations

  1. Interesting observations, particularly regarding the love triangles. There are definitely traces of this in Charlotte’s early fiction too, especially her Angrian stories featuring Zamorna, his current wife, and current mistress (he gets around a lot 😁). I always thought of Zamorna as the model for Rochester, particularly in Caroline Vernon due to his relationship with his young ward, Caroline. Here the other woman and his wife is Caroline’s half-sister, Mary, making things extra complicated.

    Depending on how you interpret Caroline Vernon, it is either a coming of age tale where the heroine explores her sexuality, or a dark one in which she is the victim of an older man. One theory even suggests Caroline is Adele without a Jane to protect her.

    Another love triangle featuring a Jane Eyre figure is in Henry Hastings where Sir William Percy falls for independent spirited teacher/companion, Elizabeth Hastings who although is drawn to him, is utterly devoted to her wild brother, Henry (created by Branwell and later developed by Charlotte, possibly as Branwell himself developed).

    I think it’s time for a re-read of Jane Eyre 😁.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I’m really looking forward to the Angrian stories, Nicola—the theory being that I would get stuck into them once I’d finished the remaining adult Brontë novels of each of the three sisters—but I may now jump in sooner rather than merely dip my toes, due to your tantalising comments… Those love triangles are really a tangle, aren’t they! Thanks for all this.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I found this really interesting, especially your breakdown of the family structures, and the use of similar names within the novel, which in turn echo biographical details. It reminded me of Emily Brönte’s (re)use of names in Wuthering Heights.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You have me at a disadvantage there, Isobel, as I’ve yet to make the acquaintance of Emily’s characters (though the bare outline of the story is not unfamiliar to me). The Brontë girls seem to have taken the literary dictum for authors to write of what you know quite literally, it seems to me!

      Like

  3. Pingback: Lessons in novel writing: panning for gold in the rubble of rejection – Word Shamble

  4. Yes, these are really interesting correspondences between CB’s life and the networks in her books. I suppose it points too to the fact that there were such defined roles for both men and women, a man occupying “a position” of some sort in society while the women just revolved around the position occupied by the man. Understandable that women of a romantic temperament would be attracted to the idea of a man who bursts out of the stereotypes of his position. I always wonder what Charlotte really thought of her husband the clergyman (what was his name?)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Arthur Nichols was CB’s husband, I suspect mildly lampooned as one of the three comic curates in Charlotte’s Shirley. Such a shame that CB held up the idea of a husband as a soul mate and yet went for Nichols whom she wasn’t particularly attracted to at all and who seems to have been a bit of a stick-in-the-mud. She certainly, like Jane, didn’t need to marry him for security as she was now a bona fide author.

      Like

    1. You’re very kind, Karen, thanks! I can’t tell if it’s my overheated imagination coming up with these possible correspondences or if Charlotte really had the mischievous turn of mind that would come up with these kinds of word games. I incline towards the latter option — but I would, wouldn’t I!

      Liked by 1 person

Do leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.